The Pistoia Alliance launches user experience maturity model for life sciences
Source:

pistoiaalliance.org

November 18, 2020

The Pistoia Alliance, a global, not-for-profit alliance that works to lower barriers to innovation in life science and healthcare R&D, has launched a free to use UXLS (User Experience in Life Sciences) maturity model. The model will help companies understand what a user-centred design culture will look like for them, and their current trajectory. User experience (UX) is coming to the forefront in life sciences as companies undergoing digital transformation have begun to realize that there is no value in implementing new software unless researchers can use it fully. The UXLS maturity model enables organizations to measure the current state of their UX capability, with a framework to plan how to move onto the next stage.

“As more scientists than ever are now working outside the lab, and often at home during the pandemic, UX centred design is paramount for productivity and efficiency. COVID-19 has put even more pressure on researchers and created a more dispersed workforce. If these researchers are fighting to ensure the systems they use are working, they could be wasting hours of their time instead of undertaking valuable research,” commented Paula de Matos, Consultant at The Pistoia Alliance. “We have launched this model following the previous success of our UX toolkit for the life sciences community in the first phase of this project. This next stage helps organizations, projects or products clarify their ambition of further integration of UX activities and develop a step-by-step action plan.”

The framework has been designed specifically for life sciences organizations and is made up of three dimensions:

  • Impact – What impact is UX having on the organisation or area?
  • UX Metrics and Analytics – How are metrics collected and used? A systematic and iterative approach to measuring UX is something many organizations aspire to.
  • Process – How are UX methodologies embedded into organizational or team processes?

Within these dimensions there are then five further stages of maturity, from a low level of one to a high level of maturity at five.

  1. What UX describes a state where there is little or no existence of UX at any of the dimensions.
  2. Isolated UX projects may have several UX projects running independently of each other. Much of this UX work may be reactive UX in the sense that teams are reacting to poorly designed solutions by bringing UX design into their delivery.
  3. Intentional UX investment reflects a state where the organisation starts to value and invest in UX capacity.
  4. Embedding UX into teams means that UX is now a part of each project delivery team and is proactively engaged from the beginning of each project.
  5. Transformational UX and services involves a higher level of UX engagement from senior leaders whereby UX is part of the company’s strategy and business value.

“In our personal lives we are surrounded by intuitive tech that ‘just works’. This same useability is now also expected in our professional lives as our reliance on digital technologies grows,” continued de Matos. “The benefits of good UX in life sciences are significant and could impact the delivery of clinical trials, the development of the ‘lab of the future’, and enable more virtual and synthetic experiments to be conducted. We hope this maturity model helps companies identify where they currently are on the UX journey and provides a clear path on how they can progress towards transformational UX.”

The UXLS maturity model is available now and can be accessed here: https://www.pistoiaalliance.org/blog/measuring-ux-maturity-with-a-uxls-maturity-model/

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a Comment.

FEEDBACK